论文部分内容阅读
Objectives: To assess how often new treatments for childhood cancer assessed i n phase III randomised trials are superior or inferior to standard treatments an d whether the pattern of successes and failures in new treatments is consistent with uncertainty being the ethical basis for enrolling patients in such trials. Design: Observational study. Setting: Phase III randomised controlled trials car ried out under the aegis of the Children’s Oncology Group between 1955 and 1997, regardless of whether they were published. Main outcome measures: Overall surv ival, event free survival, and treatment related mortality. Results: 126 trials were included, involving 152 comparisons and 36 567 patients. The odds ratio for overall survival with experimental treatments was 0.96 (99%confidence interval 0.89 to 1.03), indicating mat new treatments are as likely to be inferior as th ey are to be superior to standard treatments. This result was not affected by pu blication bias, methodological quality, treatment type, disease, or comparator. Conclusions: New treatments in childhood cancer tested in randomised controlled trials are, on average, as likely to be inferior as they are to be superior to s tandard treatments, confirming that the uncertainty principle has been operating .
Objectives: To assess how often new treatments for childhood cancer assessed in phase III randomized trials are superior or inferior to standard treatments an d whether the pattern of successes and failures in new treatments is consistent with uncertainty being the ethical basis for enrolling patients in such trials Setting: Phase III randomized controlled trials car ried out under the aegis of the Children’s Oncology Group between 1955 and 1997, regardless of they were published. Main outcome measures: Overall survival ival, event free survival, and treatment Results odds ratio of overall survival with experimental treatments was 0.96 (99% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.03), indicating mat new treatments are as likely to be inferior as th ey are to be superior to standard treatments. This result was not affected by pu blication bias, methodological quality Conclusions: New treatments in childhood cancer tested in randomized controlled trials are, on average, as likely to be inferior as they are to be superior to s tandard treatments, confirming that the uncertainty principle has been operating .