论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同类型失语患者的视命名问题。方法采用汉语失语检查法（ＡＢＣ法），对５０例因脑梗塞、脑出血、脑外伤引起的不同类型失语患者进行了５项视命名检查。结果动作命名成绩与少用物命名成绩比较差异有显著意义。动作命名平均成绩高于常用物命名、身体部位命名及颜色命名成绩。结论失语患者在接受５项视命名检查中，动作命名较容易，推测动作命名在大脑内的神经网络基础可能比较广泛。
Objective To discuss the visual naming of different types of aphasia patients. Methods Chinese aphasia test (ABC method) was used to evaluate the five kinds of visual aids in 50 patients with different types of aphasia caused by cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage and brain trauma. The results of action naming results and less named results of less significant objects significant. Action named average score higher than the common object name, body parts naming and color naming results. Conclusion Aphasia patients in the acceptance of five visual naming checks, the action naming easier, suggesting that the action named in the brain may be more extensive neural network basis.