论文部分内容阅读
目的对管理前后的西药临床用药情况进行比对,进而讨论西药临床合理用药的安全性和使用价值。方法:在2016年2月-2017年2月前来我院进行诊治的患者中选择其中的260位患者进行对比研究,将其随机分为两个不同的组别,即研究1组和研究2组。两个组别的患者人数均为130人。对研究1组的患者采用传统的临床用药管理,对研究2组的患者采用西药合理用药的管理,并对比两组采用不同管理方式下的用药错误情况的发生率以及用药后过敏等不良反应的发生情况。结果:在对两组患者进行分析对比后发现,研究1组的用药错误、药品使用方法错误、药品使用量不当等发生率高于研究2组,同时在对两组进行用药之后,研究1组的用药不良情况的发生率也高于研究2组。两组的分析对比结果差异性明显,因此具有统计学价值(P<0.05)。结论:在西药临床用药的过程中运用合理化的管理措施可以有效的降低因药物产生的不良反应发生率,减少因不合理用药以及用药量不当造成的安全隐患,此种用药管理措施值得在医疗过程中推广和使用。
Objective To compare the clinical medication situation of western medicine before and after administration, and then to discuss the safety and value of western medicine rational drug use. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-six of the patients who came to our hospital for diagnosis and treatment between February 2016 and February 2017 were compared and randomly divided into two groups, Study Group 1 and Study 2 group. Both groups had 130 patients. The patients in study group 1 were treated with traditional clinical drug administration, and the patients in study group 2 were treated with western medicine rational administration. The incidence of adverse drug reactions under different management methods and the adverse reactions such as allergy after treatment were compared between the two groups What happened? Results: After analyzing and comparing the two groups of patients, it was found that the incidence of misdiagnosis of medication, improper use of drugs and improper use of drugs in study group 1 were higher than those in study group 2, and after treatment of both groups, study group 1 The incidence of adverse drug use was also higher in Study 2 groups. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The rational management measures can effectively reduce the incidence of adverse reactions caused by drugs, reduce the potential safety hazard caused by improper use of drugs and improper dosage, which is worth the medical treatment In the promotion and use.