论文部分内容阅读
第三人干扰婚姻关系所侵犯无过错配偶一方的权益之模糊性,使无过错配偶一方能否要求干扰婚姻关系之第三人承担侵权责任存在争议。借鉴日本和我国台湾地区之价值取向,采“限制肯定说”更适合我国现状。在通奸、姘居、重婚情形中,对于善意第三人,无过错配偶一方不能请求其承担侵权责任,但仍可向过错配偶一方请求离婚损害赔偿;对于恶意第三人,则有权要求第三人承担停止侵害、恢复名誉、消除影响、赔礼道歉的侵权责任,损害赔偿则要以个案中发生实际损害后果为前提。
The third party’s interference with the fuzziness of the rights and interests of the non-faulty spouse infringed by the marital relationship makes it controversial for the non-fault spouse to claim interference with the third party of the marital relationship for tort liability. Learning from Japan and the value orientation of Taiwan in China, it is more suitable for China’s current situation to adopt “restrictions and affirmations ”. In the case of adultery, widowhood and bigamy, a spouse who is not a goodwill can not claim tort liability for a bona fide third party but may still claim for divorce from the wrong spouse, while third party The person assumes the tort liability of stopping the infringement, restoring his reputation, eliminating the influence, and apologizing for the loss. The damages must be premised on the actual damage occurred in the case.