明希豪森困境是指在论证过程中会不断产生新的论证前提,以至于产生一个无穷递归的论证模式。哲学家千百年来一直致力于论证终点的探寻,但终究无果。阿列克西的法律论证理论力求通过断言式的论辩理论,让论证达到符合理性的要求从而完成证成。虽然其理论不能称之为摆脱了明希豪森困境而只能是达到了一种妥协式的论证,理论本身也受到了诸多的反驳,但其法哲学上的学术意义仍旧不可置疑。 Mythhausen plight is that in the process of argumentation will continue to produce new premises of argument, so that there is an infinite recursive argument mode. For centuries, philosophers have been devoted to the search for the end of argument, but ultimately they have been fruitless. Alexei’s theory of legal argument seeks to prove that the argument meets the requirement of reason through assertion theory of argument. Although its theory can not be called a solution to the plight of Mühsenhausen but can only reach a compromise argument, the theory itself has received many refutations, but its academic significance in legal philosophy remains irrefutable.