论文部分内容阅读
自2002年,法国开始由邻近法官负责解决“日常生活的小纠纷”。本文介绍政治问题的演化及此演化的基础。就改革而言,通常被看作是因总统的心血来潮提出的,实际上是经历了漫长过程得出的结果。一方面,它针对非常具体的司法系统危机作出解释,另一方面,它表达了从根本上改变司法机关纠纷解决机制的愿望。此外,对这个改革专业人士表现出犹豫不决。实施这一改革需要进一步对此司法活动内容进行修订,并对新法官们进行一定程度的限制。
Since 2002, France has been responsible for solving the “minor disputes of daily life” by the neighboring judges. This article describes the evolution of political issues and the basis of this evolution. As far as reform is concerned, it is usually seen as a result of the president’s whim and is in fact the result of a long process. On the one hand, it explains the very specific crisis of the judicial system and, on the other hand, it expresses the desire to fundamentally change the dispute resolution mechanism of the judiciary. In addition, he is indecisive to this reform professional. The implementation of this reform requires further revision of the judicial activities and a certain degree of restrictions on the new judges.