“书法的形式即内容”并援引“有意味的形式”“音乐的内容就是音乐的运动形式”等著名论点,大致都没有走出西方形式主义美学的窠臼。贝尔等人的主要观点是认为艺术作品的价值不在感情和理智的内容,而在于线条、颜色、体积等构成的关系,即有意味的形式。其失误在于片面与极端,当代书坛不加分析地套用 “The form of calligraphy is content ” and quoted “meaningful form ” “the content of music is the movement form of music ” and other well-known arguments, generally not out of the Western aesthetics of formalism. The main point of Bell et al. Is that the value of a work of art is not in the content of emotion and reason, but rather in the form of lines, colors, volumes, etc. that are meaningful forms. The error lies in one-sided and extreme, contemporary calligraphy applied without analysis