论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨超声与小切口乳化治疗白内障患者的临床疗效。方法选取2012年2月至2014年2月我院收治的白内障患者62例，随机分为对照组和观察组，各31例。对照组患者给予小切口乳化治疗，观察组患者给予超声乳化吸出术治疗，比较两组患者术后视力恢复及并发症情况。结果观察组患者术后1周裸眼视力（0.80±0.15），明显高于对照组的（0.60±0.16），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组患者术后1周散光度、术后3个月的最佳矫正视力、散光度及并发症发生率比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）。结论超声乳化吸出术与小切口非超声乳化白内障摘除术治疗远期效果均较好，并发症少，但超声乳化吸出术近期疗效更优。“,”Objective To clinical effect of smal incision cataract ultrasonic emulsification and treatment of patients with.Methods From 2012 February 62 cataract patients to 2014 February in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and observation group,31 cases in each.Patients in control group were treated with smal incision emulsion treatment,observation group were treated with phacoemulsification in the treatment,recovery of visual acuity and complications were compared between the two groups after operation for the patients with.Results Patients in the observation group after 1 weeks of uncorrected visual acuity(0.80±0.15),significantly higher than the control group(0.60±0.16),the difference was statisticaly significant(P0.05).Conclusion Phacoemulsification and smal incision non phacoemulsification cataract surgery in the treatment of long term effects are good,fewer complications, but phacoemulsification relatively better short-term effect.