论文部分内容阅读
在中国这样一个由众多民族单元构成的国家里,真正意义上的“国别文学史”应该是包含了所有民族单元的文学的“多民族文学史”。少数民族文学存在现实的被忽视、单一性文学史观“话语霸权”对少数民族文学的“合理性”遮蔽是导致“多民族的国别文学史”建设严重滞后的部分原因。“多民族的国别文学史”的建设一方面需要少数民族学人对少数民族文学的高水平研究,另一方面也要注意纠正当下少数民族文学研究领域中的不良研究倾向。
In a country like China, which consists of many ethnic units, the true “history of country literature” should be “the history of multi-ethnic literature” that contains the literature of all ethnic units. The negation of the existence of minority literature exists. The “rationality” of “discourse hegemony” of minority literary history is partly responsible for the serious lag of construction of “the history of nation-state literary multinationals”. On the one hand, the construction of “multi-ethnic country literary history” requires the study of ethnic minority literature by ethnic minority scholars at a high level; on the other hand, it must also pay attention to correcting the current tendency of bad study in the field of minority literature research.