岁末年初,北京某区法院开庭审理了一件闻所未闻的案件。一个居民把邻居鸟笼里的“八哥”告上法庭。读者可以想象得到,笼子里的鸟不具备法人资格,张三起诉“八哥”的目的,是起诉“八哥”的主人李四。笔者有幸从电视台法制节目中,全须全尾地观看了这一审理过程,觉得其内涵丰富,颇值得品味咀嚼,特行文于此以会读者。具体情节是这样的:待以拆除的简易的筒子楼楼道上,设有一个自来水管,楼内居民每 At the beginning of the year and the beginning of this year, a district court in Beijing heard a case that was unheard of. One resident sued the starling in his neighbor’s cage. Readers can imagine that the birds do not have the legal personality of the cage, Zhang prosecution “starling” purpose is to prosecute “Starling” owner Li Si. I was fortunate enough to watch this trial process from the television station’s legal program. I felt it was rich in content and worth the taste and chewing. The specific situation is this: to be demolished simple cheese floor corridor, with a water pipe, each resident in the building