论文部分内容阅读
行政诉讼的举证责任分配制度有其特殊性和复杂性,它是行政诉讼证据制度的核心。《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》在我国三大诉讼制度中第一次明确规定了被告的举证责任。这一制度的确立对于实现行政诉讼的目的、促进行政机关依法行政、防止其实施违法行为和滥用职权都具有重要的意义。《最高人民法院关于执行<中华人民共和国行政诉讼法>若干问题的解释》补充和弥补了《行政诉讼法》对举证责任的不足,本文在此基础上从行政诉讼原被告双方当事人角度进一步进行分析,探究行政诉讼举证责任的合理分配。
The system of distributing the burden of proof in administrative litigation has its own particularity and complexity. It is the core of the evidence system of administrative litigation. The “Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China” explicitly laid down the defendant’s burden of proof for the first time in the three major litigation systems in our country. The establishment of this system is of great significance to the realization of administrative litigation, to promote the administration of the government according to law, to prevent its implementation of illegal activities and abuse of power. “The Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation on Some Issues Concerning the Implementation of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China” supplements and makes up for the deficiencies of the Administrative Procedure Law on the burden of proof. Based on this, this article further analyzes from the perspectives of both parties of the original defendant in administrative litigation , To explore the reasonable distribution of the burden of proof in administrative litigation.