论文部分内容阅读
宪法解释权的归属是宪法实施的基础性问题,美国普通法院解释宪法的模式在树立司法至上权威的同时也面临着理论界对它的解构,由此产生的部门主义反对司法机关排他的释宪权,认为立法分支和行政分支也具有释宪的权力,各个权力分支在宪法为其划定的权限范围内独立地行使宪法解释权,并根据功能最优的分析方法确定各个机关释宪权的优先等级。通过对部门主义理论的梳理,呈现一种新的宪法解释制度设想,提出部门主义所体现的功能主义方法论是对宪法解释视角的理论重构。
Attribution of the power of constitutional interpretation is the basic issue of the implementation of the constitution. The interpretation of constitutional mode by the U.S. ordinary courts faces the deconstruction of it by theorists while establishing the authority of the supremacy of the judiciary. The resulting sectarianism opposes the constitutional interpretation of the judiciary Power, that the legislative branches and administrative branches also have the power to interpret the Constitution, the various branches of power in the Constitution for its own authority to exercise the power of constitutional interpretation of the Constitution, and according to the function of the best analytical method to determine the various organs of the constitutional rights Priority. Through the combing of sectoral doctrine, a new concept of constitutional interpretation is presented, and the functionalist methodology embodied in sectarianism is the theoretical reconstruction of the perspective of constitutional interpretation.