展览、大赛的频繁举办为促进书法的繁荣发展,有着功不可没的促进作用。然而,由此所对应的书法批评的缺席和不力,却未能发挥应有的导向功能,当前的书法批评与创作的繁荣景象显得极不相称。一些批评文章,也是说得不痛不痒。要么是套用古人品藻的方法,说着些不伤筋骨的话;要么是照搬西方的理论,写得玄奥难懂,让人读后一头雾水,不知所云;也有的用词犀利尖酸刻薄,甚至伤及批评对象的人格等,总难尽如人意。那么,我们需要什么样的批评?呼唤“理论的真诚”的时代,我们必须应该进行深入的思考。 Exhibitions, competitions frequently held To promote the prosperity and development of calligraphy, has contributed to the promotion. However, the corresponding absence of calligraphic criticism and failure, but failed to play its due guiding function, the current calligraphy criticism and creative prosperity is extremely disproportionate. Some critical articles are equally insidious. Either way is to apply the ancients algae, saying that some do not hurt the bones of the words; either copy the Western theory, writing mysterious and difficult to understand, people confused after reading, unintelligible; some words sharp and sarcastic, Even hurt the personality of critics, the total difficult to make satisfactory. So, we need what kind of criticism? Calling “truth of theory ” era, we must think in depth.