论文部分内容阅读
目的对比改良阴式子宫切除术(GTVH)与传统阴式全子宫切除术(CTVH)的临床应用效果。方法 2014年6月~2015年7月本院行GTVH治疗的40例患者作为GTVH组,2012年6月~2013年7月本院行CTVH治疗的40例患者作为CTVH组。观察比较两组患者的手术时间、大肠蠕动恢复时间、住院时间、并发症发生情况。结果 GTVH组患者的手术时间为(63.42±23.18)min、大肠蠕动恢复时间为(22.35±12.18)h、住院时间为(7.84±3.68)d,CTVH组患者的手术时间为(93.54±31.62)min、大肠蠕动恢复时间为(26.58±14.74)h、住院时间为(9.45±3.10)d,GTVH组均短于CTVH组(P<0.05)。结论 GTVH安全性高、手术时间短、术后恢复快,对腹腔的干扰小,术后腹壁基本没有瘢痕,更为适用于盆腔炎症较重的患者,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of modified vaginal hysterectomy (GTVH) and traditional vaginal hysterectomy (CTVH). Methods Forty patients with GTVH in our hospital from June 2014 to July 2015 were selected as the GTVH group and 40 patients underwent CTVH in our hospital from June 2012 to July 2013 as the CTVH group. The operation time, recovery time of peristalsis, length of hospital stay and complication were observed and compared between the two groups. Results The operation time of GTVH group was (63.42 ± 23.18) min, the recovery time of peristalsis was (22.35 ± 12.18) h, the hospitalization time was (7.84 ± 3.68) d, and the operation time was (93.54 ± 31.62) min in CTVH group , The recovery time of peristalsis was (26.58 ± 14.74) h, the length of hospital stay was (9.45 ± 3.10) days, and the GTVH group was shorter than that of CTVH group (P <0.05). Conclusions GTVH is safe, short in operation time and quick in postoperative recovery. It has little interference on abdominal cavity and little scar in abdominal wall. It is more suitable for patients with severe pelvic inflammatory disease and is worthy of clinical promotion.