王龙溪、罗近溪都主张良知现成、不学不虑而自得 ,对卓吾“童心说”的影响至为明显。近溪赤子良心之论是“童心说”的直接理论源头。近溪贵身与卓吾论“私”意蕴相通。龙溪多讲先天正心 ,对道德的正面阐论并不多见 ,对传统道德理念的突破正是卓吾所要关注的理论重点。龙溪与卓吾在性情及文论方面亦更多应合。卓吾与二溪亦有区别 :童心但证其“真” ,而不究其仁 ,二溪着意于真与仁的结合 ;卓吾之“私”是一己之“私” ,近溪所论 ,是大我与个我的结合。 Wang Longxi and Luo Jinxi all advocate that conscience should be readily available and should not forget about what they think they are. Proximity brooks’ conscience is the direct theoretical source of “innocence”. Near Creek and Zhuo on your “private” implication. Longxi speak innate congenital heart, positive moral interpretation is rare, the breakthrough of traditional moral ideas is Zhuo Wu’s theoretical focus. Longxi and Zhuo wu in the character and literary theory also more should be combined. There are also differences between Zhuowu and Erxi: innocence but evidence of its “truth”, but not about its benevolence. Erxi is about the combination of true and benevolent; Zhuo’s “private” is its own “private” , Is a combination of me and a person.