《安龙逸史》与屈大均行文风格不符,应是溪上樵隐调查访问后所作。由于直书南明历史,触犯清讳,受到查禁,流传不广,目前只有嘉业堂本和云图藏本两个体系。该书属于纲目体,纲简目详,层次分明,叙事清晰,要言不烦;史学观念突出纲常伦理和正统观念,以南明永历帝为尽忠对象和正统标准,分别对忠臣李定国和逆臣孙可望作了相反的塑造。由于记事相对可靠,且集中在永历朝,特别是永历在安龙阶段,因此具有独到的史料价值。 “An Longyong history” and Qu Dajun style of writing does not match, should be on the river Qiao hidden investigation after the visit. Because of the direct book Nanming history, offended taboo, banned, not widely circulated, at present only Jiayoudangben and cloud map of the two systems. The book belongs to the outline of the outline, outline simple outline, outline clearly, the narrative clear, the words do not bother; historiography concepts often outdated ethics and orthodoxy, with Southern Ming Yongli Emperor as loyalty object and orthodox standards, respectively, Made the opposite shape. As the memo is relatively reliable, and concentrated in the Yongli Dynasty, especially Yongli in the Anlong period, it has unique historical value.