论文部分内容阅读
目的 对比分析碱性成纤维细胞生长因子 (bFGF)及宫颈红外线凝结法对宫颈糜烂的治疗效果。方法 2 0 0 2年 4～ 8月 ,对 72例患者按宫颈糜烂类型的不同分为 3大组 ,每组又再按患者入选序号随机分为治疗组及对照组 ,前者直接使用bFGF ,后者使用宫颈红外线凝结法治疗宫颈糜烂。 1个月后复查 ,观察糜烂面愈合及治疗后阴道出血情况。结果 两种方法治疗单纯型、颗粒型及轻、中度宫颈糜烂 ,疗效差异无显著性意义 (P >0 0 5 ) ;对于乳突型及重度宫颈糜烂 ,红外线凝结法优于bFGF ,疗效差异有显著性意义 (P <0 0 5 )。治疗组无一例发生阴道出血 ,而对照组术后均有不同程度的阴道出血。结论 bFGF治疗单纯型、颗粒型及轻、中度宫颈糜烂与传统的宫颈红外线凝结法比较 ,疗效差异无显著性意义 ,且无发生阴道出血的可能 ;而对于乳突型或重度宫颈糜烂 ,后者仍然占有明显优势
Objective To compare and analyze the therapeutic effect of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and cervical infrared coagulation on cervical erosion. Methods From April to August 2002, 72 patients were divided into 3 groups according to the types of cervical erosion. Each group was divided into treatment group and control group according to the patient’s selected sequence number. The former received bFGF directly. The use of cervical infrared coagulation treatment of cervical erosion. 1 month after the review, observe the healing of the erosion surface and vaginal bleeding after treatment. Results There was no significant difference between the two methods in the treatment of simple type, granular type and mild to moderate cervical erosion (P> 0.05). For mastoid type and severe cervical erosion, infrared coagulation was superior to bFGF There is significant (P <0 05). No case of vaginal bleeding in the treatment group, while the control group had different degrees of postoperative vaginal bleeding. Conclusion bFGF treatment of simple type, granular type and mild to moderate cervical erosion compared with the traditional cervical infrared coagulation, the effect was no significant difference, and no possibility of vaginal bleeding; and for mastoid or severe cervical erosion, after Still have a clear advantage