记得一九三四年七月,英国著名的历史家威尔斯访问莫斯科,曾与史丹林谈话一次,引起全世界的注目,那次谈话的内容,早经译成各国文字辗转披露了.现在美联社社长霍华德又于三月一日在克林姆宫与史丹林会见;据霍华德的报告,史丹林谈话的态度,不仅异常谦逊,抑且十分诚挚,既非鲁莽灭裂以一万七千万人的独裁者自居,亦无盛气凌人刚愎自用的军人气概,这种度实出人意料之外.我们看了这几句话,便知道史丹林给与霍华德的印象,跟过去资本主义各国的报纸,把布尔雪维克首领描写得像「怪物」一样,是大有差别的.史丹林对霍华德谈了些什么呢?依照电讯,他们曾谈到远东时局,曾谈到欧洲危机,曾谈到世界革命,曾谈到苏美邦交,曾谈到社会主义基本问题,曾谈到苏联的新宪法.……因为谈话的内容非常广泛,而且说明了苏联的国际政策,所以引起全世界的注目,更在史丹林与威尔斯的谈话之上.莫斯科新闻报指出史丹林的答复为一最重要的政治文献,为一有历史意义的谈话,将获得数千万心灵的响应,而为各地人民的研究资料.莫斯科真理报更指出史丹林答复的坦白,实为布尔雪维克党及苏联政府各种政策的特性,且在每一句 I remember Wells, a famous British historian, who visited Moscow in July 1934 and once talked with Stalin, arousing the attention of the world. The content of that conversation has been disclosed as early as possible in various countries and languages. Howard, the president of the Associated Press, met again with Stalin on March 1 at Klimson’s Palace. According to Howard’s report, Stalin’s attitude of conversation was not only unusually modest but also very sincere. It was neither reckless and ruinous to the one hundred and seventy million It is surprising that the dictators of the human beings, who are neither domineering nor self-serving in military affairs, saw the words that Stanling gave Howard and the newspapers in the past in capitalist countries, Vik leader described as “monster.” What is the difference between what Stanley told Howard? According to telecommunications, they talked about the current situation in the Far East, had talked about the European crisis, had talked about the world revolution, once When it comes to diplomatic relations between the Soviet Union and the United States, we talked about the basic socialism issue and talked about the new Soviet constitution. ... Because the contents of the talks are very extensive and the Soviet Union’s international policies are described, it has drawn the attention of the whole world and even the history Lin and Wells, and Moscow Newspaper pointed out that Stanley’s response was one of the most important political documents that will yield tens of millions of spiritual responses to historical conversations and study data for people everywhere. The Pravda newspaper in Moscow also pointed out that the candidance of Stanley’s reply was in fact the nature of various policies of the Bolsheviks and the Soviet government. In each sentence