论文部分内容阅读
2015年重庆医改的失败折射出实际运行中的重大行政决策社会稳定风险评估机制往往出现“科学性”缺乏和“政治性”干预并存的困境。在大数据时代背景下,要有效破解当下重大行政决策社会稳定风险评估机制在实际运行中所面临的问题,必须从制度层面对重大行政决策社会稳定风险评估机制的科学性和民主性两个方面进行制度性重构:一方面,需推行循“数”评估制度,建立风险数据价值实现流程,确保评估结果的科学性;另一方面,在循“数”的基础上还需推行对抗式评估制度,建立双向“对抗辩论式”评估程序,以此来增强评估结果的民主性。
The failure of medical reform in Chongqing in 2015 reflects that the administrative risk assessment of social security in the major administrative decisions in practice often has the coexistence of lack of “science” and “political” interference. Under the background of big data era, we must effectively solve the problems in the actual operation of the social stability risk assessment mechanism of major administrative decision-making in the current era. We must study the scientific and democratic risk assessment mechanism of major administrative decision- Institutional reconstruction: On the one hand, we need to follow the evaluation system of “number” and establish the process of realizing the value of risk data so as to ensure the scientific results; on the other hand, on the basis of “number” The implementation of adversarial assessment system and the establishment of a two-way “adversarial” assessment process have enhanced the democratic character of the assessment results.