《信陵君窃符救赵》,这一标题不妥.课题是主谓短语,按照语言习惯理解,“窃符”的是信陵君,而非别人.然而,说“信陵君救赵”没有弊病,加“窃符”二字就有点问题了.因为根据情节,窃符之举,出谋者是侯生,实践者是如姬,信陵君不过是从侯生之计,请求如姬这样做罢了.着一“窃”字,实在容易误会为信陵君亲自决策,主动盗窃,把“信陵君”和 “Xin Ling Jun steals the character to save Zhao”, this title is not appropriate. The subject is the subject-predicate phrase, in accordance with language habits, “the swindle” is the letter to the king, but not others. However, said “Lingling Jun save Zhao ”There are no ills, and adding the word “stolen” is a bit of a problem. Because according to the plot, the act of stealing, the contributor is Hou Sheng, the practitioner is such as Ji, Xin Ling Jun is only from the Hou Sheng’s plan, the request such as Ji In this way, it is easy to misunderstand the word “stealing”, and it is easy to misunderstand the fact that Xinlingjun personally made the decision and took the initiative to steal and put the “letter to the king” and