论文部分内容阅读
通过分析广义价值决定理论的两部门模型和N部门模型,本文认为无论是广义价值论的两部门模型还是广义价值论的N部门模型,都不仅不符合基本的经济现实,而且违背了正常的逻辑推理,根本没有资格成为继劳动价值论、新古典价值论和斯拉法价值论之后的所谓第四大价值理论体系。本文揭示了广义价值论构建过程中逻辑推理的随意性和主观性。
By analyzing the two-part model and the N-part model of generalized value decision theory, this paper argues that both the two-part model of generalized axioms and the N-part of generalized value theory not only do not accord with the basic economic reality but also violate the normal logic Reasoning, there is no qualifications to become the so-called fourth theory of value theory after the labor theory of value, neoclassical theory of value and Slash’s theory of value. This article reveals the arbitrariness and subjectivity of logical reasoning in the process of constructing generalized axiology.