论文部分内容阅读
从民众参与司法过程来看,人民监督员制度与美国大陪审团、日本检察审查会、我国人民陪审员制度有许多共同之处,各自体现的司法理念和价值是相同的,但在主体资格条件、选任方式、职权范围、审查方式、决议效力等方面存在较大差异。建议人民监督员制度在确定人员资格方面取消政治素质、法律知识等条件限制;在人员选任上可从人大代表和政协委员中以抽签的方式产生;人民监督员监督范围不宜再作扩大,而是在现有基础上,突出监督重点。
Judging from the people’s participation in the judicial process, the system of people’s supervisors has much in common with the grand jury in the United States, Japan’s procuratorial review and the people’s assessor system in our country. Each of them has the same judicial concept and value. However, , The method of appointment, the terms of reference, the ways of examination, the effectiveness of resolutions and so on. It is suggested that the system of people’s supervisors should abolish the conditions such as political qualifications and legal knowledge in determining the qualifications of personnel; the election of personnel should be conducted by drawing lots among representatives of the NPC and CPPCC members; the scope of supervision by the people’s supervisors should not be further expanded, but rather On the basis of the existing, highlight the focus of supervision.