论文部分内容阅读
在对第二国际庸俗马克思主义、资本主义物化现象的批判以及吸收黑格尔辩证法的基础上,卢卡奇提出总体性思想,阐释了总体性与物化、总体性与无产阶级意识的关联。但卢卡奇黑格尔式的解读马克思主义,使他对马克思主义的富有意义的解释,终不能摆脱黑格尔哲学框架的束缚而达到马克思哲学的革命本质。重温科耶夫作为存在论的黑格尔辩证法,我们会发现卢卡奇对黑格尔辩证法是一种有缺陷的解读。劳动和斗争,则是使总体性思想摆脱唯心主义残余影响的重要因素。
Based on the criticism of the second international vulgar Marxism and capitalist materialization and the absorption of Hegelian dialectics, Lukacs proposed the general idea and explained the relationship between generality and materialization and generality and proletarian consciousness. However, Lukjic’s Hegelian interpretation of Marxism and his meaningful explanation of Marxism can not finally get rid of the shackles of Hegel’s philosophical framework and achieve the revolutionary nature of Marx’s philosophy. To review Kojev as the ontological Hegelian dialectics, we find that Lukacs is a flawed interpretation of Hegelian dialectics. Labor and struggle are important elements that free the general idea from the remnants of idealism.