论文部分内容阅读
本文对清王朝控制和统治湘黔边“苗疆”及其“生苗”的政策，即“苗防”政策措施作了历史的考评。认为清朝统治者继承了明代的军事圈围、封锁和隔离政策，但同时在“苗疆”建治设官、兴教办学、实行“化导”政策，这又与明代有明显区别。而清王朝的政策，在其前期和后期，自身也有很大变化。屯堡碉卡和“边墙”有“防”的作用，但主要的功能是军事镇压和攻战；“边墙”所区分的只是苗、汉生活区域和田土耕种范围，是明、清王朝在自己疆域内对不统治区的划分，以分而治之。这在性质上与中国古代“长城”完全不同。
This article makes a historical review on the policy of “Miaojiang” and its “seedlings” that control and rule the border area of Hunan and Guizhou during the Qing Dynasty. The Qing dynasty rulers inherited the policy of military encirclement, blockade and isolation of the Ming dynasty. However, at the same time, the establishment of officials in Miaojiang and the promotion of education and implementation of the “guide and guide” policy were obviously different from those in the Ming Dynasty. The policies of the Qing dynasty, in its early and late phases, have also undergone great changes. The main function of the “fortification” of Tuen Fort and the “side wall” is to “prevent” the enemy. The main function of the “wall” is to distinguish between the living areas of the Miao and Han dynasties and the cultivated land in the fields and the Ming and Qing dynasties In their own territory on the division of non-dominated areas, divide and rule. This is totally different from ancient “Great Wall” in China.