论文部分内容阅读
在中国古代学术史上,继宋明以后的清代近三百年学术究竟如何定位,歧义甚多。钱穆《中国近三百年学术史》认为清代学术为宋、明的直接承继,其《清儒学案序》中说:“宋明理学之盛,人所俱晓,迄于清代,若又为蔑弃宋明重返汉唐。故说者莫不谓清代乃理学之衰世,夷考其实,亦复不然。……要之有清三百年学术大流,论其精神,仍自沿续宋明理学一派,不当与汉唐经学等量比拟,则昭昭无可疑者。”梁启超《清代学术概论》则认为清代学术(思
In ancient Chinese academic history, following the Song and Ming Dynasties, nearly three hundred years of academia exactly how to position, much ambiguity. Qian Mu “Chinese academic history nearly three hundred years” that the Qing Dynasty academics as the direct successor to the Song and Ming, “Qing Confucianism in the sequence,” said: “The Song and Ming dynasties of science, people know, as of the Qing Dynasty, If it is to abandon the Song and Ming to return to the Han and Tang Dynasties. Therefore, the author does not mean that the Qing Dynasty is the decline of the science of Confucianism, the test is not the case ... ... there must be clear 300 years of academic flow, on its spirit, still since Along the continuation of Neo-Confucianism, the improper analogy with the Han and Tang Dynasties, then the Zhaozhao no doubt. ”“ Liang Qichao ”Introduction to the Qing Dynasty" is that the academic thinking of the Qing Dynasty