论文部分内容阅读
现行《合同法》颁布时没有关于情事变更的规定,但随着我国社会生活和司法实践中陆续出现大量的情事变更问题和司法判例,最高人民法院在《合同法解释(二)》中第26条最终明确了这一规定。该内容在特定条件下允许当事人解除合同,免除继续履行合同的责任,故其是债法中关于合同效力及指导合同履行的一项重要内容。但是该内容是一项合同法基本原则还是一项具体制度,到目前为止还未取得一致意见。本文首先采取比较的方法从国外有关情事变更的规定引入,区别法律原则与法律制度,然后结合我国的有关规定为情事变更正名,具体分析理由,最后得出其应当作为一项合同法制度的结论。
At present, there are no provisions on the alteration of circumstances in the current Contract Law. However, with the gradual emergence of a large number of changes in circumstances and judicial precedents in China’s social life and judicial practice, the Supreme People’s Court, in Article 26 Article finally made clear this provision. This content allows the parties to terminate the contract under certain conditions and dispense with the responsibility of continuing to perform the contract. Therefore, it is an important part of the debt law regarding the effectiveness of the contract and the performance of the contract. However, the content is a basic principle of contract law or a specific system, so far no consensus has been reached. Firstly, this paper introduces a comparative method to introduce the change of circumstances in foreign countries, distinguishes the legal principle from the legal system, and then changes the name of the affair in light of the relevant provisions of our country, analyzes the reasons in detail, and concludes that it should be concluded as a contract law system .