论文部分内容阅读
近代日本的土地征收案件中,最多的是损失补偿额方面的纠纷。关于土地征收工程的发起人、工程费用负担人、征用权人、损失补偿义务人里面,谁应该作为被告,存在较大的分歧。1926年7月20目的大审院第二民事部判决认为,损失补偿诉讼应该以县知事为被告。1930年1月29日的大审院民事联合部判决则部分地吸收了雉本朗造的观点,承认了复数的补偿义务人。而美浓部达吉认为,被告应该是发起人,他将发起人分为国家、公共团体和私人三种,之后他又修正了自己的观点,将发起人限定为工程费用的负担人。
Modern Japan’s land expropriation cases, the most is the amount of damages compensation disputes. On the land expropriation project sponsors, project cost burden, the right to requisitioned people, loss of compensation who, who should be as defendants, there is a big difference. July 20, 1926 Purpose The Second Civil Division of the Great Court decides that the lawsuit of compensation for damages should take County Governor as defendant. On January 29, 1930, the judgments of the Civil Division of the Grand Council absorbed the view of Mr. Pyohben and partially acknowledged the indemnities of the plural. And Minakatu Daiji believes that the defendant should be the sponsor. He divided the promoters into three categories: state, public organization and private sector. Later, he amended his point of view to limit sponsors to the burden of construction costs.