《六国论》一文中有句云 :“赵尝五战于秦 ,二败而三胜。”课本 (必修 )未注 ,而配套“教参”对此作了“补充”说明。笔者认为 ,“教参”所列关于赵、秦“五战”的所谓史实 ,同句子原意风马牛不相及 ,只能对读者起到误导作用 ,故有必要辨正如下 :为明确起见 ,先来看“教参”有? There is a sentence in the article “On the Six Kingdoms”: “Zhao Ta served in the Qin dynasty and defeated it with three victories.” The textbook (required) did not note, and the supporting “teaching ginseng” made a “supplementary” explanation. The author believes that the so-called historical facts listed by Zhao Jiao and Qin on the “five wars” of the “Guo Senate” are incompatible with the original meaning of the sentence and can only play a misleading role for the readers. Therefore, it is necessary to discern the following: For the sake of clarity, First look at “teaching reference” there?