论文部分内容阅读
目的：分析研究针对临床危重患者采取皮气管切开术的治疗方法以及治疗效果，为临床提供有力的依据。方法选取我院在2015年1月到2016年1月所收治的危重患者资料100例开展回顾性分析，根据100例患者治疗方法的不同将其分为两组，每组各50例，其中研究组患者接受经皮气管切开手术治疗，对照组患者接受传统气管切开手术治疗，比较研究组和对照组患者手术时间、切口大小、出血量和出现并发症情况，将所得各项数值进行统计学分析。结果研究组患者的手术时间显著短于对照组，患者的切口大小显著小于对照组，患者手术期间出血量显著低于对照组，两组比较存在统计学意义（P＜0.05）；研究组患者手术之后出现并发症的几率低于对照组，其中切口感染率以及切口溢痰率显著低于对照组，两组比较存在统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论针对临床危重患者采取经皮气管切开术的操作时间比较短，对患者造成的创口小，患者出血量少，同时产生并发症的几率低，属于一类在床边微创并且快捷的急救手术方式，能够有效替代传统气管切开手术，应该在临床中大力推广使用。“,”Objective To study the clinical treatment of critical y il patients by percutaneous tracheotomy and treatment effect, provide the basis for the clinical. Methods in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 from the data of 100 cases of critical y il patients to carry out retrospective analysis of 100 cases, according to the different treatment methods for the patients wil be divided into two groups, 50 cases in each group, the study group of patients undergoing percutaneous tracheotomy surgery, control group patients received traditional tracheotomy surgery. Compared with the study group and the control group of patients with operation time, incision size, blood loss and complications, resulting the numerical statistical analysis. Results the operation time of patients in the study group was significantly shorter than the control group, the incision size were significantly less than the control group, the amount of bleeding during surgery were significantly lower than the control group, the two groups had statistical significance (P < 0.05); patients in study group after complications rate lower than the control group, the rate of incision infection and incision the overflow rate of sputum was significantly lower than the control group, the two groups had statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion according to the clinical critical patients through percutaneous tracheotomy operation time is short, the patients caused by a smal wound, less bleeding patients, and complications of low probability, which belongs to a kind of emergency surgery at the bedside minimal y invasive and efficient, effective alternative to traditional tracheotomy, should be popularized in clinical use.