论文部分内容阅读
法国行政法上的成本—效益分析作为一种司法对行政行为的深度审查技术,同时也作为一种重要的行政裁量权统制技术,其产生和发展均得益于国家行政法院在判例上的探索。从性质上说,成本—效益方法借用了行政法上比例原则的审查思路,但其与比例原则在具体运用上也存在细微差别。在具体审查内容上,成本—效益分析是法官对行政机关对于事实的法律认定的审查,可更有效地将行政裁量权置于司法监督之下。同时,法官对成本—效益分析方法的谦抑使用也防止了司法专断的出现。
Cost-Benefit Analysis in French Administrative Law As a kind of judicial reviewing technology of administrative action, it also serves as an important technology for the control of administrative discretion. Its production and development benefit from the exploration of jurisprudence of the State Administrative Court . In essence, the cost-benefit approach borrows the examination of the principle of proportionality in administrative law, but there is a slight difference in the specific application of the principle of proportionality. In the specific content of the review, the cost-benefit analysis is the judge’s examination of the legal recognition of the fact by the administrative organ, which can put the administrative discretion under the judicial supervision more effectively. At the same time, the modest use of judges’ methods of cost-benefit analysis prevented the emergence of judicial dictatorship.