论文部分内容阅读
鉴定制度在现代诉讼中存在巨大的实践需求,日益发挥着举足轻重的作用。面对我国鉴定体制积弊已久、效果不彰的现状,2012年《刑事诉讼法》对此作了较为系统的修改,回应了理论界与实务界的呼声。目前我国诉讼领域已经形成司法鉴定、专家证人、专家辅助人三足鼎立的格局,为此,应探索既有格局的成因,分析不同制度的利弊。在此基础上,以模式淡化与制度互补的方式,细化《刑事诉讼法》的鉴定规则,推动鉴定制度改革进一步深入。
Identification system in the modern litigation there is a huge practical needs, playing an increasingly important role. Faced with the long-standing and ineffective current situation of the appraisal system in our country, the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012 made a relatively systematic revision to this and responded to the calls of theorists and practitioners. At present, the field of litigation in China has formed a pattern of judicial examination, expert witness and expert supporter. Therefore, we should explore the causes of the existing pattern and analyze the pros and cons of different systems. On the basis of this, we should refine the appraisal rules of “Criminal Procedure Law” by means of mode dilution and system complementarity so as to further promote the reform of appraisal system.