论文部分内容阅读
近年来,诉讼法学界部分学者认为两审终审制存在诸多弊端,需要加以改革。并有学者提出变两审终审制为三审终审制的设想,但在三审终审制是否适合我国国情,可否见到预期效果等问题上,也同样存在着针锋相对的观点。本文第一部分将对我国现行审级制度优劣之处逐一进行阐述,在第二部分中基于上述现存实践与现存理论的基础上认为维持并完善两审终审制较建立三审终审制或有限三审制为佳。
In recent years, some scholars in the field of procedural law think that there are many drawbacks in the system of the second instance trial, which needs to be reformed. Some scholars have proposed to change the system of final approval of second instance into the concept of third instance final approval system. However, there are also diametrically opposed views on whether the third instance final approval system is suitable for China’s national conditions and whether expected results can be seen. In the second part, based on the above existing practice and existing theories, the first part of this article will elaborate on the advantages and disadvantages of the current trial-level system in our country. Trial is better.