论文部分内容阅读
《军事知识》1989年第7期发表的夏玉文同志《莫以考核定乾坤》的文章,读后颇受启发。文章在充分肯定“考核是上级检验、了解下级某项军事技能掌握程度的必要方法”的基础上,对目前考核存在的诸多弊端作了令人信服的论述,并对“仅以考核定乾坤”的做法提出了质疑。但是,夏文提出的问题只是一个方面。在目前尚无更完备的手段能够对部队工作做出科学评估的情况下,考核仍不失为检验工作的一个重要方法。在没有战争的和平时期,从某种意义上讲,考场就是战场,我们还是要以
“Military knowledge” 1989 the seventh issue of Comrade Xia Yuwen “MO to test the evaluation of heaven and earth” article, after reading quite inspired. On the basis of fully affirming “examination is the higher level test, to understand the subordinate a certain degree of military skill mastery ”, based on the current examination of the many drawbacks made a convincing discussion, and Ding Qiankun "approach questioned. However, Xia Wen’s question is only one aspect. In the absence of a more comprehensive means to make a scientific assessment of the work of the troops, assessment is still an important method of inspection work. In the absence of a war of peace, in a sense, the examination room is the battlefield, and we still have to