论文部分内容阅读
一、序论“辛亥革命”的研究,早已蔚为大观,特别在挣脱以意识形态先行的“正统史学”之钳制以后,现今史界同仁探讨的视野,渐趋宽广,观察的角度,更趋多元。那种漫笔挥洒“辛亥革命与社会变迁”广袤历史图景的成果,不再是研究的主要思路;对于“革命”行动和思潮勃然而兴的年份,已可进行细腻的描摹;甚至检讨当事者执笔之史著,如何打造了“辛亥革命”主流历史记忆的基础,也成为史家着意的课题。因此,如何在前行研究的基础上,别辟新径,另启新衢,让我们对“辛亥革命”的认识,愈形丰赡,实为后起学人应该肩负的责任。本文之作,拟从比较广泛的思想脉络的视野,略示一二,期可提醒吾辈同好,“辛亥革命”的研究,仍有无限的天地,正等待着后继学人施展身手,好让前行者的栽植,长青永茂。
First, the preface The study on the Revolution of 1911 has long been a spectacle. Especially after breaking away from the prejudice of “orthodox historiography” with ideology, the field of vision explored by colleagues in the history of the world today is becoming broader and more observational. More diverse. The achievements of the vast historical picture of “Manchurian Revolution and Social Changes” are no longer the main ideas of the study; they can be traced exquisitely in those years in which the “revolutionary” movement and ideological trend have flourished. To review the history of the parties’ writing and how to build the foundation of the mainstream historical memories of the Revolution of 1911 has also become a topic of deliberation by historians. Therefore, on the basis of our predecessor’s research, we should not make new paths but also start new ones so that our understanding of the “1911 Revolution” will become more and more generous, which in fact will be the responsibility that should be shouldered by the scholars. This article, intended from a broader perspective of the ideological context, a little sketchy or two, can remind our generation of the same, “Revolution of 1911 ” research, there are still infinite world, is waiting for successors to play their roles, good Let the predecessor’s planting, evergreen Yongmao.