论文部分内容阅读
通过具体实例的比较分析,对国家图书馆和CALIS联机编目中心的有关诗学文献的分类标引提出质疑和商榷。诗学在文学界是个高频词,CALIS及国图联合编目中心对这类文献的分类标引大多归类为诗歌理论或诗歌评论与研究:即I052或I106.2及I3/7.072。但是,许多文献题名中虽有“诗学”字眼,内容却与诗歌理论毫无关系或关系不大,而属于文艺理论或比较文学范畴,《中图法》归类应为I0、I01或I0-03。
Through the comparative analysis of specific examples, this paper queried and discussed the classification and indexing of poetic literature of National Library and Online Cataloging Center of CALIS. Poetics is a high-frequency word in the literary world. The categorization and indexing of such documents by CALIS and the National Catalog Joint Cataloging Center is mostly classified as poetry theory or poetic comment and research: I052 or I106.2 and I3 / 7.072. However, although many of the titles in the literature have “poetics” in their title but have no or little relation with the theory of poetry, they belong to the category of literary theory or comparative literature. The classification of “Chinese Library Classification” should be I0, I01 Or I0-03.