马克思政治经济学与西方主流经济学围绕方法论科学性的论战旷日持久的根源之一,在于缺乏系统的经济学方法论科学范式的划界标准。从科学哲学自然演化的维度,逐层理清经济学方法论科学性的基本法则,然后,通过比较分析经济学两大理论体系方法论的主流苑式,能够证明它们本质上其实都在遵循着经济学方法论科学范式的一般实证标准。那么,以此可以深入研究经济学两大理论体系方法论糅合的可行途径,求同存异、取长补短,来推动经济学方法论科学范式的标准化和科学发展。 One of the root causes of the protracted debate over the scientific nature of methodologies lies in the lack of a demarcation standard for systematic scientific paradigms in methodology of economic methodology. From the perspective of the natural evolution of philosophy of science, the basic laws of scientific methodology of economics are stratified into layers one by one. Then, by comparing and analyzing the mainstream models of the methodology of the two major theoretical systems of economics, we can prove that they are all essentially following the principles of economics General Empirical Standards of Methodological Science Paradigms. Then, in order to deepen the feasibility study of the methodology of the two theoretical systems of economics, seek common ground while reserving differences and learn from each other’s strengths to promote the standardization and scientific development of the scientific paradigm of economics.