论文部分内容阅读
两年前,上海非沪籍女孩占海特曾就异地高考问题在微博上约辩上海沪籍人士,引发了一场关于异地高考权的激烈交锋。两年过去了,高考制度的一项重大改革——异地高考正在全国多个省份陆续推开。关于异地高考,见仁见智,抵制的一方提出,要考虑到本地户籍人口和外来人员的高考利益平衡,以及本地的教育资源承载力和城市的容量。而支持的一方则喊出“教育平等”的口号,认为自己同样为城市纳税做贡献,应该享受异地高考的权利。由此,笔者想到美国的伦理学家罗尔斯在其《正义论》中这样一个理论:
Two years ago, Shanghai non-Shanghai girl accounted for Hite had off-campus entrance exam on microblogging Shanghai and Shanghai defenders, triggering a fierce confrontation on the right to college entrance examination. Two years later, a major reform of the college entrance examination system - a number of provinces across the country are gradually opened. On the remote college entrance examination, a matter of opinion, the boycott party proposed to take into account the balance of interest of local college enrollment and foreign workers in the college entrance examination, as well as local education resources and city capacity. The supportive party, on the other hand, shouted slogans such as “equality in education,” believing that they also contribute to urban tax payment and should enjoy the rights of college entrance examination in different places. Thus, I think of the American ethicist Rawls in his “theory of justice” in such a theory: