论文部分内容阅读
胡长清、成克杰两个身处高位的巨贪先后伏法后,国人无不欢欣鼓舞,奔走相告。只是人们在拍手称快之余,总有一种过程、结局并非十分圆满的缺憾。于是就先有了鄢烈山先生《胡长清案存疑》(见2000.4.25的《杂文报》)的大作,继有了阮直先生《哪个群众检举揭发了成克杰》(见2000.5.16《杂文报》)之佳篇。 在下对胡、成两案的发现、处理过程,亦存疑不少。我这人有个习惯,现实中每有困惑,总愿找点历史上相似的个案进行比较。王夫之不是说了吗,“所贵乎史者,述以往以为来者师也”。开国之初的反贪第一刀,中共当年对党内和政府内腐败惩治效率之高、作风之雷厉风行和对腐败根除之无情彻底,令人称道。原天津地委书记刘青山、副书记张子善之腐败行为是什么时候发现的?1951年10月上旬。又是什么时候结案处理
Hu Changqing, Cheng Kejie two are in high positions after the huge law has volunteered, the Chinese are all rejoicing, running admiration. Only people clap their hands apart, there is always a process, the outcome is not very satisfactory shortcomings. Then, there was a masterpiece of Mr. Yan Lieshan’s “Case of Suspect in Hu Changqing” (see “The Essay Press” of April 25, 2000), followed by Mr. Nguyen Thien, “Which People Reported and Discovered Cheng Kejie” (2000.5.16) “) The best articles. There are also many doubts about the discovery and handling of the two cases. I have a habit of this man, in reality, every time I am confused, I am always looking for some similar cases in history to be compared. Wang Fu-chih not say it, ”who cares historians, who said in the past that teachers also." At the very beginning of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, it was commendable that the CPC should first of all punish corruption in the party and the government with high efficiency, with a vigorous work style and a thoroughgoing ruthless eradication of corruption. When was the case of Liu Qingshan, former secretary of the Tianjin Municipal Party Committee, and Zhang Zishan, the deputy secretary, discovered in the early part of 1951? When is the case closed?