论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨米非司酮配伍米索前列醇不同用药途径终止中期妊娠的效果。方法 采用口服米非司酮配伍米索法为口服组 ,口服米非司酮联合阴道后穹隆放置米索法为联合用药组 ,比较两组在流产时间及需清宫人数、药物副作用方面的差异。结果 口服组 3 6例 ,有效 3 3例 ,其中完全流产 13例 ,不全流产 2 0例 ,需清宫 ,清宫率 60 61% ,无效 3例 ;15例出现药物反应 ,反应较重。联合用药组 3 6例 ,有效 3 4例 ,完全流产 2 1例 ,不全流产 13例 ,需清宫 ,清宫率 3 8 2 4% ,无效 3例。 7例出现药物反应 ,反应较轻。两组对照 ,清宫率有显著差异P <0 0 5 ;药物副作用两组对比P <0 0 5 ,有显著意义。结论 米非司酮配伍米索前列醇阴道放置 ,显著降低不全流产清宫率和药物的副作用
Objective To investigate the effect of mifepristone and misoprostol on termination of middle-term pregnancy by different routes of administration. Methods oral mifepristone combined with misoprostol for the oral group, oral mifepristone combined vaginal posterior fornisolysis misoprostol for the combination group, the two groups in the abortion time and the number of need to be Qing, the side effects of the drug differences. Results The oral group of 36 cases, effective in 33 cases, of which 13 cases of complete abortion, incomplete abortion 20 cases need to be Qing, Qing rate of 6061%, 3 cases of ineffective; 15 cases of drug reactions, the reaction was heavy. There were 36 cases in the combination group, 34 cases were effective, 21 cases of complete abortion, 13 cases of incomplete abortion, 3 824% of the need of Qing, 3 cases of inefficiency and 3 cases ineffective. 7 cases of drug reactions, the reaction is light. Two groups of control, the rate of clear palace have significant difference P <0 05; drug side effects in both groups P <0 0 5, significant. Conclusion Mifepristone with misoprostol placed in the vagina significantly reduces the rate of incomplete abortion and drug side effects