论文部分内容阅读
目的评价LEEP刀治疗宫颈糜烂的优势。方法回顾分析120例患者的临床资料。结果单纯型29例,治愈28例,有效1例;颗粒型55例,治愈50例,有效4例,无效1例;乳突型36例,治愈29例,有效5例,无效2例;不同分型的总有效率差异无统计学意义,而治愈率则与糜烂程度和糜烂病理类型显著相关。结论 LEEP刀具有诊断及治疗双重作用,简便易行,不影响以后妊娠,是诊治宫颈疾病安全有效的方法。
Objective To evaluate the advantages of LEEP knife in the treatment of cervical erosion. Methods The clinical data of 120 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results There were 29 cases of simple type, 28 cases were cured and 1 case was effective. There were 55 cases of granular type, 50 cases were cured, 4 cases were effective and 1 case was ineffective. 36 cases were mastoid type, 29 cases were cured, 5 cases were effective and 2 cases were ineffective. The total effective rate of typing was not statistically significant, while the cure rate was significantly correlated with the degree of erosion and the pathological type of erosion. Conclusion LEEP knife has the dual role of diagnosis and treatment, simple and easy, does not affect the future pregnancy, is a safe and effective method of diagnosis and treatment of cervical disease.