论文部分内容阅读
1937年12月13日,日军占领南京,随即发生了一场震惊世界的惨案——南京大屠杀。在后来远东国际军事法庭上,制造这一惨案的日军华中方面军的最高指挥官松井石根被判处了绞刑。然而,在东京审判后的几十年中,一直有人认为对松井的判决有失公正。日本右翼学者田中正明等人甚至著书立说,公然为松井开脱罪责。他们的主要观点是:(1)松井出征中国,只不过是在执行大本营之令;(2)日军在进攻南京之前,松井曾下令整肃军纪;(3)当日军进攻南
December 13, 1937, the Japanese occupation of Nanjing, followed by a tragedy that shocked the world - the Nanjing massacre. Later, at the Far East International Military Tribunal, Song Ishihara, the supreme commander of the Japanese Central Military Forces in manufacturing this tragedy, was sentenced to death. However, in the decades following Tokyo’s trial, there was always a perception of unfair judgment against Matsui. Right-scholar of Japan Tianzheng Zhengming and others even wrote a book, openly blame for Matsui. Their main points of view are: (1) Matsui expedition to China, but in the implementation of the command of the base camp; (2) before the Japanese attack on Nanjing, Matsui had ordered to purge the military discipline; (3)