论文部分内容阅读
随着社会经济的发展,环境纠纷也随之渐渐增多。环境民事纠纷在我国现阶段的解决途径主要包括当事人和解、调解、信访、仲裁和诉讼五种。针对不同解决途径对比分析之后,笔者认为结果缺乏强制执行力的解决途径效用有很大局限性,结果具有强制执行力的解决途径效用更佳。文章首先对我国解决环境民事纠纷的各种途径逐一简要评析,然后重点对结果具有强制执行力的仲裁和诉讼在文本层面上和实践中存在的问题进行讨论,最后给出完善具有强制执行力的解决途径的建议。
With the social and economic development, environmental disputes also will gradually increase. Environmental civil disputes in China at this stage to resolve the main ways include the parties to reconciliation, mediation, letters, arbitration and litigation five. After analyzing and comparing different solutions, the author thinks there is a great limitation on the utility of the solution to the lack of enforcement power. As a result, the solution with enforcement power is more effective. First of all, the article briefly reviews each way of solving environmental civil disputes in our country, and then discusses the problems existing in the text and the practice of arbitration and litigation with enforcing power. Finally, Suggested solutions.