论文部分内容阅读
目的:剖析上前牙阻生通过口腔正畸治疗,分析其临床疗效。方法:抽取54例,时间范围在2016年2月至2017年2月在本院进行治疗的上前牙阻生患者,设置为本次调研对象,采用口腔正畸术联合外科导萌术作为观察组,病例27例;单纯性采取外科导萌术作为对照组,病例27例。利用不同分组治疗情况,比较两组临床疗效。结果:进行口腔正畸术和外科导萌术的观察组在临床疗效上远高于对照组,数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在随访6个月后,观察组情况依旧好于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:单纯性采取外科导萌术治疗上前牙阻生的临床疗效远没有口腔正畸术联合外科导萌术好,患者病情恢复快,利于前牙萌出,其效果在临床上推广有重要意义。
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of orthodontic treatment on the obstruction of anterior teeth. Methods: Totally 54 patients were enrolled in this study from February 2016 to February 2017 in our hospital. Orthodontics combined with surgical sprouting was used as the observation object Group, 27 cases of cases; simple surgery to introduce sprouting as a control group, 27 cases. The use of different treatment groups, the clinical efficacy of two groups were compared. Results: The clinical efficacy of orthodontics and surgical sprouting was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (P <0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the observation group was still better than the control group Control group (P <0.05). Conclusions: The clinical effect of simple surgical intervention on anterior superior occlusion is far less than that of oral orthodontics combined with surgical invasive sprouting. The patients recover quickly and benefit the eruption of anterior teeth, which is of great importance in the clinical popularization .