论文部分内容阅读
文艺批评不同于一些相似的研究,这些研究在某些部分上不是由论题的差异性,如果压根儿不是这种差异性而是由兴趣和目的的差异而组成研究本身.很清楚批评只能用功能的术语来解释.只有在我们同意文艺批评的真实本质和功能的同时,才能同意对文艺批评与艺术史有区别的解释.没有人能提供任何一种概述性的解释来说明对这一结论的简缩.如果我们接受艾略特先生的观点,“用书面语言来评论和解释艺术作品”.我们就立即会陷入“评论”和“解释”的意义的矛盾之中,比如艾略特先生就会对释文无所事事.“文艺批评著作的极大部分在于解释作者、作品……,但是当批评作品压根儿不是一部说明书时,它的‘说明’才是合法的,这是完全可以肯定的.而批评作品只仅仅让读者去占有事实,这种事实他或许会遗漏的.”与艾略特的观点相反,斯托佛先生和许多其他作家对批评的本质都持有相同的观点,认为,解释作品是批评的一个主要功能.他说:“任何一位批评家都是打算象释义者和构建体系者那样从事批评工作的个人.‘释义’是一切优秀批评的目的,它以某种方式来改善艺术与观众之间的关系”.这里的差异性似乎存在于每一个作家对“释义”这个
Literary criticism is different from some similar studies, which in some parts are not the differences in theses, if not at all those differences, but by the differences in interests and purposes that make up the research itself. Clearly criticism can only be used Function of the term to explain.Only when we agree with the true nature and function of literary criticism at the same time, we can agree on the distinction between literary criticism and art history explanation.No one can provide any kind of general explanation to illustrate this conclusion If we accept Mr. Eliot’s point of view, “commenting and interpreting the work of art in a written language,” we immediately fall into the contradiction between the meaning of “comment” and “interpretation,” as Mr. Eliot Will have nothing to do with the text. “A great part of a literary criticism is to explain the author, the work ..., but it is entirely certain that the ’description’ of a critique is legal when it is not a statement at all. And the fact that he criticizes a work for the reader to take possession only of fact may have been omitted. ”Contrary to Eliot’s point of view, Mr. Stowe and many others The same holds true for the very nature of criticism, which holds that explaining works is one of the main functions of criticism: “Any critic who is a person who intends to act as a critic like a commentator or a constructor.” Interpretation is the purpose of all good criticism and in some way improves the relationship between art and audience. “The difference here seems to lie in the fact that every writer interprets the meaning of” paraphrase "