论文部分内容阅读
清代乾嘉时期学术考证名家辈出,成果丰硕,治学方法迥异于前代。江藩《汉学师承记》的著成,客观上正符合对此进行适时总结之需要。本书第一次将乾嘉考证学作为学术史的重要的发展作了总结性的考察,梳理出其演进的脉络,评价其意义,此一总结性研究从整个清代而言未有出其右者。此书又一成功之处,是不停留在论述学者的生平行事和著述的主要内容等项,并且着力摹写他们的治学特色和精神风貌。
In the Qing Dynasty, there were many masters of academic research in the period of Qianlong and Jiaqing, with fruitful results and different ways of treating scholarship. Jiang Fan’s acceptance of the “Han Scholar” is, objectively, in line with the need for a timely summary of this. For the first time, this book made a concluding examination of the research of Qianlong textual research as an important development in academic history, sorted out the context of its evolution and evaluated its significance. This summative study has not been published in the whole Qing Dynasty Right. Another successful book, is not to stay in the discussion of the life of scholars and the main content of the writings, and focus on the description of their academic characteristics and mental outlook.