自愿性作为口供的内在必备要素,系证据能力的资格条件,因此,其判断的法律后果是证据的采纳与否问题,是采信的前提与基础。自愿性的表述系主观的内心状态,但可以使其通过与违法取证的客观行为联系起来予以外化征表,为其认定提供客观的标准。而且这种判断以至排除应该兼顾社会利益与个人利益、打击犯罪与保障人权、程序公正与实体公正,寻求合理的定位与平衡,并维护公平的“游戏”规则。 Therefore, the legal consequence of the judgment is whether the evidence is adopted or not, which is the precondition and foundation of the letter collection. Voluntary expression is the subjective inner state, but it can be externalized through the association with the objective behavior of illegal forensics to provide an objective standard for its determination. Moreover, such judgments should be ruled out so as to balance social interests with individual interests, combat crime and protect human rights, fair procedures and substantive justice, seek reasonable orientation and balance, and safeguard fair “game rules.”