“在旧的历史主义的观念中,历史无疑是大于文学的,也就是说,历史事实的真实性大于文学的想象和虚构性,然而新历史主义或将这一矛盾关系颠倒过来,强调文学大于历史,把文学注入历史的生命中。”[1]文学与历史这一对语汇,在发展历程中,往往是历史决定了文学,甚至,对于司马迁在《史记》中文学手法的使用,至今还被某些学者诟病,似乎历史一沾上文学的虚构就象美器粘了尘埃, In the old historicist concept, history is undoubtedly larger than literature, that is to say, the authenticity of historical facts is greater than the imagination and fictionality of literature. However, neo-historicism reverses this contradiction and stresses that literature Is greater than the history, the literature into the life of history. “[1] Literature and history of this pair of vocabulary, in the course of development, often history determines the literature, and even Sima Qian in the” Historical Records "in the use of Chinese techniques, So far, it has also been criticized by some scholars. It seems that the historical fictionalization of literature is like the dust of the United States.