论文部分内容阅读
近20年来,自然辩证法在中国演化成科学技术哲学。这个领域的研究问题异常庞杂,从曲高和寡的自然哲学、认识论问题到大众关注的伪科学、科技创新问题,从久远的科技史问题到时兴的环境伦理、克隆人、虚拟实在问题,从科学方法和科学规范问题到问题意识的树立、超越情怀的培养问题,基本上囊括了与科学技术有关的各个领域。而科学技术哲学研究的问题域,是伴随着对于科学本质的认识、科学方法论的总结与反思、科学思想史研究的深入、科技社会学与科技伦理等领域的探索以及人文社会科学哲学的兴起而不断拓展、深化的。刘大椿教授是我国当代科技哲学专业的领军性人物,在某种意义上可以说,迄今为止,他的研究取向集中体现了中国科技哲学领域的基本发展方向。刘大椿教授的学术生涯从“科学是什么”这个科学哲学的“中心”问题开始,历经了一个逐渐向方法论、科学思想史、科技社会学、技术哲学、乃至科技伦理学、技术创新研究、人文社会科学哲学等领域发散的过程。他不是试图营建无所不包的体系,而是不断发现和提出问题,并追随问题给出别开生面的思考,似乎在经历着一个从中心到边缘的转换。正是在这种转换中,新的理论生长点不断出现,研究的问题域不断扩张,创新型的思维活动异常活跃。他率先提出了科学活动论、互补方法论等理论,为科学技术哲学专业的基本建设做出了积极贡献。他所编写的教材和发表的论著一直在学界有着重要影响并广为采用。
In the past 20 years, dialectics of nature has evolved into philosophy of science and technology in China. The research questions in this field are extremely complex. From the high school philosophy of natural science and epistemology to the pseudo-science and technology innovation that people pay close attention to, from the long history of science and technology to fashionable environmental ethics, cloning and virtual reality, Scientific normative issues to the establishment of problem awareness, beyond the cultivation of feelings, basically covers all aspects related to science and technology. The problem domain of philosophy of science and technology is accompanied by the understanding of the nature of science, the summarization and reflection of scientific methodology, the deepening of the research on the history of scientific thought, the exploration of science and technology sociology and ethics of science and technology, and the rise of humanities and social science philosophy Constantly expand, deepen. Professor Liu Da-chun, a leading figure in contemporary philosophy of science and technology in China, can be said in a certain sense that so far his research orientation has embodied the basic development direction in the field of Chinese philosophy of science and technology. Professor Liu Da-chun’s academic career begins with the “center” of the scientific philosophy of “What is science?” And has undergone a gradual transition from a methodology, a history of scientific thought, a sociology of science and technology, a philosophy of technology, and even a science and technology ethnology, a study of technological innovation, a humanistic society Philosophy of science and other fields divergent process. Instead of trying to build a system that is all-encompassing, he constantly discovers and presents problems and follows the questions uncompromisingly. He seems to be experiencing a transformation from center to periphery. It is in this transformation that new theoretical growth points continue to emerge, areas of research are constantly expanding, and innovative thinking activities are exceptionally active. He took the lead in putting forward the theories of scientific activity and complementary methodology, and made positive contributions to the basic construction of philosophy of science and technology. His textbooks and published works have always had a significant influence on academia and are widely adopted.