论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨中心静脉导管胸腔置管持续引流和常规穿刺治疗中等量以上胸腔积液的诊断治疗价值。方法:对分别用中心静脉导管持续引流或常规胸腔穿刺治疗的318例患者资料进行分析。结果:静脉导管持续胸腔引流治疗优于常规穿刺,两组患者胸膜反应等并发症对比统计学分析P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论:中心静脉导管持续胸腔引流治疗中等量以上胸腔积液方法简单,痛苦少,费用降低,临床疗效好,值得推广。
Objective: To investigate the value of continuous catheterization of central venous catheter in the treatment of moderate-level pleural effusion with conventional puncture. Methods: Data of 318 patients who were treated with continuous central venous catheter drainage or conventional thoracentesis were analyzed. Results: Continuous catheterization of thoracic duct drainage was superior to conventional puncture. The complications such as pleural reaction between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05), the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The central venous catheter continuous chest drainage for the treatment of moderate amount of pleural effusion method is simple, less pain, lower costs, good clinical efficacy, it is worth promoting.