论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨在泌尿外科中腹腔镜手术的临床治疗效果,对比传统开放手术与腹腔镜手术的差异。方法:选取我院138例泌尿外科手术病人为研究对象,将其随机分为治疗组(腹腔镜手术组)和对照组(传统手术组)两组,每组69例。观察两组病人在手术时间(min)、平均出血总量(mL)、住院天数(d)、置管引流时间(min)、尿管留置时间(mL)、静脉输液时间(d)及并发症几方面的治疗效果分析。结果:与传统手术组相比,腹腔镜手术治疗组在手术时间(min)、平均出血总量(mL)、置管引流时间、导尿管留置时间、静脉输液时间及并发症上均有所减少,住院天数(d)也相应缩短,两组比较有显著差异(P<0.05),有统计学意义。结论:在泌尿外科应用腹腔镜技术,具有微创、手术时间短、手术中出血量少、置管引流时间和导尿管留置时间短及并发症少等优点,使病人恢复快、缩短治疗周期,值得临床广泛应用。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic surgery in urology and to compare the differences between traditional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery. Methods: A total of 138 patients undergoing urological surgery in our hospital were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into treatment group (laparoscopic surgery group) and control group (conventional surgery group), with 69 cases in each group. The operation time (min), total amount of bleeding (mL), length of hospital stay (d), catheter drainage time (min), catheter indwelling time (mL), intravenous infusion time Several aspects of the treatment effect analysis. Results: Compared with the traditional surgery group, the laparoscopic surgery group had a significant difference in the operation time (min), the total amount of bleeding (mL), catheter drainage time, urinary catheter retention time, intravenous infusion time and complications (D) also shortened correspondingly. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05), which was statistically significant. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery in urology has the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, short operative time, less bleeding during operation, shorter catheter drainage time, shorter urinary retention time and fewer complications, so that patients recover quickly and shorten the treatment cycle , It is widely used in clinical practice.